Orientation :
our reckoning and sense of out come, independence and dependence, our self and one another, the world and separation, as projected parts of our whole,
placed centred right – human condition

Orientation :
spirit, essence at core of All creation and the whole self
at base of domed diaphragm
whole self, body and being
of reality in reality
touched by the rest of creation
cosmo 5 written labelsAll creation God – reality : more than the
sum of the fundamentals and qualities we may derive of reality from the phenomenal world we may “sense”. The phenomenal world is in turn (can be said to be) created by our whole of information from the sense organs of the whole self and body that are sensitive to the “phenomenal aspects of reality”

“I” and “am”, labels.

I am soul's reach and st'ry tel'n fellaThe “I” extends out from mind’s identity, loops under the dome of the “arch of language” (circularity) over mind’s spread, and strikes down straight between body sense from spine and inside of soul’s reach. “am” fits either side of the arch onto right shoulder, pinching the “story tell’n fella” (Arch of language;  Cornered across, “I am”. I am

We are branded with bare letters, the text symbols of our language. As with the “Bass clef”, and “labeling” in general, this association in our actuality is fundamental (makes it), direct (what it is) and knowing (recognisable), for actuality being our truth as projection.


Various parts to our reality may be determined in space, occupying a certain place and distribution in their actuality as projection, and depicted. They are also recognised for what they are and “labelled” or named.

cornered across

cornered across and lined-up in vision

waiting Jan14 2

Bass clef

Knobbly join 1b texted 2 ed

Knobbly join

Depictions and labelling include our immediate aspects; the conscious, mind’s identity and the worlds outside and within (“Knobbly join”), of vision (“Cornered and lined-up in vision”) and of sound (“Bass clef”).

Ascending assertion

Ascending assertion

Philosophical concepts of infinitism, circularity and foundationalism (Munchausen’s trilemma), are placed where they exist or cornered off bigoccur in their actuality on our “Arch of language”; as are the psychological terms of repression, suppression, denial and resistance placed where they are, displaced from the “cornered settings” of our “Ascending assertion”.

I am not and eye of HorisSymbols (hieroglyphics), characters and letters self-reference onto us, and where they are and originate from (“I am not and eye of Horis). The commonality of these symbols suggest something fundamental of humanity.

We can ponder at this, but also consider our actuality.

The labels do not intend directly to encourage thought or discussion about the aspects of our reality. They come from a direct or innate recognition of our make-up, as they are or exist. The aspects of our reality are more fundamental as projection than, what we may determine and grasp as sense and notion. The innate recognition or knowing of our actuality comes before language and our usual cognitive knowing. Labelling should not necessarily take us away from our actuality. In and as actuality we may refer to our whole to be in relation with our whole self.

The depictions indicate “where” and their labelling point at “what” the various aspects of our projected reality are, in space amongst other parts, and in relation with the whole self. They mean to draw us to actuality and signpost our relation with our whole.

“Munchausen’s trilemma on the Arch of language”, am I?”

Munchausen’s trilemma   

dilemma – a situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between
two or more alternatives, especially ones that are equally undesirable.”

What we determine depends on context. We question or scrutinise what we are convinced of, to be more certain. There are the issues of perception and perspective, context, and language.

Further more, proof needs support from something other than itself that can back-it-up, another proof for the previous, which in turn needs another proof to support it, and so it goes, on and on. It is regression ad infinitum towards a broader and more fundamental or basic basis.

The unsatisfactory and incomplete nature of certainty is described in Munchausen’s trilemma. Trilemma refers to the three possible inconclusive and unsatisfactory scenarios to sceptic pursuit:
1) Infinitism – regression of proof needing further proof goes on forever;

2) Circularity – original statement to prove is included in subsequent proofs;

3) Foundationalism – what stands because it is not questioned, where an assumption can be used as proof if it is unchallenged or agreed.d



“On” the Arch of language as projected actuality

Those philosophical concepts termed as numbered, 1)Infinitism; 2)Circularity; and 3)Foundationalism, are there to be recognised in their actuality, projected in space, as they occur and manifest in our projected reality.

arch lang c2The Arch of language crowns our linguistic realm, and carries the trilemmas that bound our certainty in the mind. Parts of our make-up in their actuality, and including our own self as actuality, to be in relation with our whole self.

See previous Blog : Cornered across, “I am”
And next Blog : “I” and “am”, labels

“I” hangs under the dome of the Arch of language

We rise to and make a stand under the dome of the Arch of language. Introduce spread to vertical sense and depth by including your own self as actuality, again to further consider our whole, more and more apart from or more a part of and more of a part of, or apart from and less.



“Our” phenomenal worlds, inside and out

The phenomenal world is the world we may experience and try to understand. It is loosely referred to as “the world” and is usually synonymous with the objective world. It is said to be what presents to our senses. The whole body has the eyes and other sense organs, however; we as an identity do not.

While we may think we sense things, all we actually ever do as an identity, is experience, have an experience or be the experience-er. Part of that experience is what allows us to think we sense and do things, while the whole self is the one who actually does and is. We as self, together with the phenomenal world, including our here and now, are projected (see below and else where for projection) parts of our whole self.

Since the wot and the wit (worlds out there and in there) are both there for us to experience, I suggest they are both phenomena, created by the whole self and projected or placed in space through the brain-spine (Central Nervous System), of information gathered via internal sense organs and those to the outside, other information, and their processing.

With outside and inside realms, and our cognitive or mind identity in between them, our reality is “constructed” or made-up of incomplete parts that must belong to a more comprehensive whole, who is our whole being in reality.

Reality must be more than the sum of all that we may “think we sense” of reality and the fundamentals, qualities, theories and models we can determine, deduce, derive and imagine of reality, from the phenomenal world we experience. Our phenomenal worlds are themselves based on the information that presents to the whole body’s sense organs of, what I term, the “phenomenal aspects of reality”, that the sense organs are sensitive to and register. Even if machines are used to sense things and amass information we physically cannot, such data is of aspects of reality we design machines to sense, from which we may strengthen and correct our understanding certainly, but we are still only closer to reality and only in our minds. There’s more to our reality – our further and deeper parts, and disassociated parts – and there’s our whole. He or she is beyond our reality of conscious experience and phenomena or what we may experience, yet includes our all as a part.

In fact our whole being is of reality, is touched by the rest of reality and is in reality. As a part, we may be in relation with the whole living being of reality we belong to.

knobbly join

for the exhibition “Cognitive part”