the human condition 0027 31May – fundamental and universal


the human condition and reality
– fundamental and universal

Universal and fundamental is projection – by our whole being, through the CNS

The human condition and reality, hc.r
Gendo, Orientation

Fundamental and universal, of us and our reality, is projection – our projected “actuality” (in projected space), and our “whole being” of reality who projects us (through his or her CNS or Central Nervous System).
Projection means there’s who projects.
“Behind all this”, our reality, is our whole being, whose CNS is an integral part of him or her.
How can we be in relation with our whole? Why should we care?

In our whole, in his or her projected part,
we have our freedom and place
our existential self and social identity
exhaustion and sleep, vitality and life
our human being-ness and animal nature
the child within us and the regressive forms
our sense of the worlds out-side and within,
of others, places and time,
and of self.

The sub-conscious other-side and
deeper conscious being below,
our conscious and
our sense of boundary and beyond,
they extend
different ways
in different directions.

Our all
and all that we may be,
is a part of our whole.

How may we be,
as part of this whole being?

Quantum and projection

All be it indirectly (through our whole being‘s sense organs and brain), we are given an experience that is an indication of the “phenomenal aspects of reality”, the aspects of reality that our whole self is sensitive to according to his or her sense organs (link to blog the “phenomenal aspects of reality”

Our whole “sees” the light (and projects our experience of vision for us to think that we see) that bounces off the surface of things in the real world that are not too small. Sub-atomic particles are too small for this. En mass and intensity they can split atoms, damage genes and cells and burn things. Depending on how they are “observed”, their existence is indicated by their radiation (wave like quality) or by the mark left after their passage (as particles), say through a sensitive film that leaves a hole or a mark of where they were.

The precise existence of sub-atomic particles is uncertain in our space-and-time references, and they seem to “jump” and “associate” right through them. I think the things that “move” at the speed of causality (= C, also “happens to be” the speed of light, other electro-magnetic waves, sub-atomic particles/radiation and gravitational waves) exist in space-time, in what may be considered the very fabric of the cosmos. It may also include black holes, dark energy and dark matter beyond our visible realm. This idea of sub-particles, photons and other electro magnetic radiation and gravity waves existing in space-time, to me helps explain how entanglement works as described in quantum mechanics – where associated particles are related across significant distances the moment one of them is observed or determined in our space-and-time references.

Let me consider here how our existence as projection, our “projected actuality”, projected by our whole being through the Central Nervous System, is like the quantum state.

I think something like entanglement also occurs in projection, in very familiar instances. When we communicate, it is with an another who invariably sees not him or her self but an image of the other’s whole being, and vice versa where we meet “entangled” as opposites in association over particular perspectives and contexts that, for our time together, determines one another in our projected realities. Empathy is a real thing in projection, of another’s sense projected by our whole. It is again, an association that determines one another. Intuitive sense seems to transcend the normally dominant cognitive boundaries in a less constrained flow or connection where, in the analogy of the quantum world, our distances, time and identity seem to join or mesh as if in space-time.

Smooth synchronised movements in dance, sports, martial arts, music but also any activity or work, requires an integration across different parts within an individual and with separate whole others that one may play with, hunt with, perform with etc. This association is stifled and blocked by the rigidity of our cognitive knowing. We are familiar with risking the seeming security of know-how‘s certainty and control, to allow and let go to or “go with” a greater flow we become a part of, whether in one’s being or in association with others.

In projection, we may exist within the determining references of our projected sense of space-and-time, but we may also exist in our actuality as projection and be “connected”, with different realms, identities and states of being, as if in space-time. Perhaps we may understand in this way premonitions, telepathy etc. where the normal boundaries of time-and-place and identity, seem transcended.

Parts of our projected reality include our sense of matter and the world, but also the frames of reference that determine what we experience. We may as self or identity in our reality, observe the laws of Newtonian physics (of billiard balls and planets) in those things we experience. It is a part of our projected reality consistent with space-and-time, a functional indication of such a world with our sense of being in it and its time, that is our here and now.

We are normally dominated by this indication of the world, changing apparently through our sense of time with the observer, us, as the experience-er, before the witness. In our actuality as projection we occupy the “causal” fabric and substance of projection, as if of space-time itself, which in turn may be considered the very fabric of the cosmos and of which space-and-time is understood to be a warping of space-time. The witness is the constant, as if set at the speed of causality = C throughout the shifting frames of reference.

As remarkable as the quantum and relativistic world may be, reality must be more than the sum of both and of any other aspects of reality. The probability of our whole being’s existence is also more remarkable than the non-living matter of atoms, entropically, functionally and structurally speaking. The enormity of the integrity, of cells in themselves, their specialising into organs and their functions but also of an integrated and “stable” living whole being, is reflected in the richness of qualities that determine our self and our necessary “countenances” – necessary for our particular reality, our self and what we experience, to be. The countenances are our “entangled other” and are projected parts of our whole being, normally in our subconscious and unconscious, and include our memories, dreaming, deeper feelings, instinctive and intuitive parts. Compared to these the qualities that determine sub-atomic particles and their entangled association with an other, is elemental, such as their spin.

As a sub-atomic particle may be lost in space-time from its potential of being a part of a whole atom, we our selves as an identity, are lost in projection away from our whole, identified in our self and with what we experience. Our other, our countenances, are many for us, because we have identified and “associated” with many things on many occasions. They build up in our subconscious as we continue to identify away from our whole.

Our whole should determine our existence and our other parts for their being parts of the same whole. Be displaced from your experience, and the life that you are having, be distinct from people you meet, but as a part. It’s not just all in the mind but your feelings and deepest being and sense of self, others and the world, are also there, as projected parts of the same whole.

Just as reality must be more than the sum of the Newtonian, quantum, relativistic and of any other aspects of reality, our whole is both of solid organs and projection, and is more than their sum. He or she is also of reality, and in reality.

Within the projected part of our whole being, we may be the billiard balls (Newtonian), before the reference of perspective, and manifest, in the experience, like matter and gravity within the warping of space-time, but in projection. We can also be the observer in our self having the experience, with shifting points of view and references (relativity) but with a witness, which may witness the observer or experiencer (that is us) as well as what we experience.

In our actuality, we connect through projection beyond being the observer having an experience, and the witness is included/invited. Our parts join with our whole as parts, through projection, in our/their actuality as projection. Being projected actuality is like being a quantum entity in and of space-time; we become a part in the very fabric of our whole being who’s (projection’s) warping throws our here and now and tangible reality that correspond to space-and-time and matter.


Physics goes beyond “the observer makes a difference” for sub-atomic particles that are displaced or altered with the act of observing them. Instead of attempting direct observations, laboratory apparatus use “passive ways”, as I understand, to monitor the quantum, such as to filter photons of a certain polarity, by which a relation between associated photons are demonstrated.

This relatedness seems to occur instantly across space-and-time, faster than the speed of causality, without being predetermined and at the instant of determination (by passive means).

Understanding this and its mechanism is the frontier of science. Consciousness and causality may have a speed that is measured in our references of space-and-time, but creation, or reality if in our minds we need no creator for creation, is there, in the instant, everywhere, is of space-time; reality is present in the present; our “here and now” unfolding (projected space-and-time) is a “warped” projected part, of our whole being of reality; reality is more than the sum of its aspects we may recognise in our projected reality (quantum, relativistic, Newtonian aspects) and try to understand.

This perspective, over reality itself and our own projected reality of “conscious experience and self witnessed”, is afforded by “Orientation” of our reality, including our self, in space and with our whole being. We do not exist in reality, our whole self does. We are a projected part of who is both body and projection, and more than their sum. We do not exist without our whole, but we may be lost in projection isolated from our whole. We may become an integrating part, rather than isolated; our whole becomes more integrated and complete with integrating parts.

Our whole is like the universe for us – our world extends and opens indefinitely in different ways in different directions, within a projected part of our whole being. Our whole is beyond our projected part (transcendent) and yet he or she infuses it (immanent). Like an electron of an electron cloud within an atom, we are an identity within a projected “cloud” of our whole. Our whole being “must be” for our self and our reality, as projected parts, to be. He or she must be a “godly being” for being of reality, and for being more than the sum of his or her parts.

We can be absolute with “Orientation” about our basis, origin and source. We have our whole as our creator and projector, and the conscious and witness are projected parts. Before them is our mind’s certainty, of infinit-ism, circularity, and foundational-ism (see Munchausen’s trilemma), which is dependent on their sequence, world views and contexts, and causality.

As a part of our whole, we may be in association with our fellow parts, including our estranged entanglements or countenances. Free and independent as a part of, rather than in isolation from our whole. Set by our others and our not-s, displaced and distant, alienated or estranged, or not, but associated with them, through our whole as projected parts of our maker; we, in reality as parts, of our individual whole.

Finally, analogies were drawn here between the fields of physics that seem to correspond with the various aspects of our projected reality. Understanding that the whole self provides what we experience of the world, from aspects of reality that he or she is sensitive to through his or her sense organs (“phenomenal aspects of reality”), lends insight into the very activity of physicists and the nature of their theories.

I propose the Newtonian, relativistic and quantum worlds exist in our actuality, as projected virtual versions of those aspects of reality. Physicists experience and try to understand them, those projected versions, and test their theories, of them, out on each other and in reality.

While reality is more than the sum of those aspects of reality grasped by the various fields of physics, the whole self projects those aspects in accurate enough ways that the theories and formulas formed of them, do work in reality when they are tested in experiments and applied in products and inventions.

I know others have made the association between our reality and the quantum out-look, but I mean to point out our actuality, the “shapes” and places they occupy and our being in relation, as a part, with our whole. I refer to Chalmers (1986) who makes a useful distinction between the easy and hard “problem of the conscious” where the objective aspects of our conscious experience is “easily” understood as a product of the brain, but not the subjective – the experience itself (rather than what we experience), the self, conscious, and I like to add the witness. He examines many approaches to the basis of our reality and distinguishes the objective and subjective aspects of our reality and proposes our subjective aspects to be fundamental ie irreducible.

Through out my work you will see the whole self presented as who projects, through the Central Nervous System, our reality both subjective and objective, internal and outside. There is no brain without a whole being, except in our minds.

Our philosophy and science can never be reality. I believe our understanding of reality can grow beyond quantum and relativistic theories, perhaps a formula established that binds both the quantum and relativistic, but only with our inclusion as the observer and the witness, as well as the conscious, as parts and in relation with our whole, who is of reality. We can “orientate” with and distinguish our self and the whole self, our reality and reality, and come to the relation between our reality and reality, in our being a part of our whole who is of reality.

Quantum and projection


There’s a godly being of reality
who is the maker of our actuality;
we exist as a part of this whole being
in and as his or her projection
projected through the brain and spine (CNS or Central Nervous System).

Together with and within our reality
we are projected, our self and what we experience,
through the CNS by our whole;
our whole is more than the sum
of his or her projected and solid-body parts.

Now of reality :

Einstein theorised and formulated for
a constant that binds shifting frames;
causality has a speed observed constant
within relative frames of reference related
through the geometric fabric of space-and-time.

Matter, gravity and energy
is wrapped up in it, it seems;
till we go beyond dimensions far and small
where matter is shattered in black holes
and with nuclear reactions in our bombs reactors and accelerators.

Matter and energy play out their existence
in sub-atomic particles
we measure the effects of;
with radiation traces we guess probable
their statistical place and certain entanglement (causal association observed in space-and-time).

But also within our reality that is projection :

There’s where we determine this or that
what we experience tangible in
our space-and-time Newtonian grid.

There’s where we sift through threads split and splayed,
shifting frames of reference held
constant by the witness.
And there’s where, in our very existence as projected actuality,
our probable nature is set certain
through an other in entanglement.

Indignation this interdependence
paired entangled, when determined
easily convinced because isolated
in fear of contradiction and in denial of its conflict
flight/fight trigger sets us from our whole;
friend or foe, love and hate,
certain confusion the closer we get
to our associated other,
within or out.

In our actuality is the connection
to our whole being of reality;
beyond determined
definitive in context,
set relative in face of the witness,
and deemed probable as quantum parcel
entangled against another,
approach being projection
your part and the other.

Then, in your actuality,
your existence infact as projection,
contemplate your whole
connect through projection
commune as a part;
to be “in relation with” your whole
is more than the sum of these steps,
our whole is more than the sum of projected and solid-body parts,
and reality, of which our whole is of, is more than the sum of quantum and space-time aspects.

tt Oct 2016

Gendo Orientation 001a Spr3, 2016


The human condition and reality.

1) Orientation in space
Our reality is projected through the brain and spine or the CNS (Central Nervous System) by the whole self. We occupy space as a part of the whole self, in our “actuality”, our existence in fact in space as projection. The fundamental very make-up of our reality has geometric shape !
2) Orientation with the whole self
Geometry :        The space we occupy in our actuality as projection, has “shape” that is vertically stacked Architectural : and held according to an upright whole being and his or her CNS. Understand your part in Engineered :     your actuality as projected through a CNS of level brain and vertical spine, and your part means there’s a whole.
3) Process of reality
The whole self is of reality and in reality, while we are in projection. Our fundamental truth is what we are, a projected part, which means there’s a whole being. We identify however, in our self and identity and with what we experience. We are isolated in this identification, from our whole. Others, the world, our deepest sense of being, keep us in identification. What we experience, they seem real, and even if they are illusion what else is there?
They are projection. Fundamental, of your reality. And it means there’s your whole being.
Nothing is denied of your reality as you consider your whole. A process of integration ensues, in “conscious experience and self witnessed” of becoming a part and becoming more of a part. The whole is closer for having integrating rather than isolating parts. Your self and sense of others, the world and being a part.   21Nov16 embryo over other end 2ab.jpg


Actuality, ours and our whole

the existence, in space and in fact, of our reality
as projection and as projected in space
by our whole, through the brain spine and nerve roots,
as is for us;
you and I and us
in our reality, as projected by
our whole beings,
of reality and next to others in reality.

Our actuality,
yours and mine and ours, in and of
the human reality, experience and condition, is
a part of
an individual whole;
we exist, the world exists, and we are, thus us, in our being, we are,
do exist, as part of our whole,
in reality and who is one of reality.

Take refuge, as part.

Who do I talk and listen to
apart from me and you and
anyone I can understand,
listen and be listened to?

A part, apart from its whole
may consider its whole;
even as a part,
apart from you or me,
us and our whole.

A curl and a curve
splits our part
within our part
within our whole.

to core and seed be released,
our part through split stem, the curl and curve
attached past and part,
like belly button remnants, both ends.

To living being, our whole.

bass and title nno

The bass clef is used in music notation to indicate the lower bass range of notes. I believe it has found its way, from projected shape and actuality, into our world of symbols because it “rings true” in representing the deep booming and threatening noise we jump to and sight; shifting in our vertical turret, we align our sense of self towards the noise, to determine or judge “friend or foe”.

Also introducing the treble clef, of the tones that opens and turns us.

bass and trebble, curl and curve

Bass clef, treble clef and the curl and curve



“The whole body is ….” 4

The whole body is reality, for us in “our reality”.

Our reality
– “Our reality” is conscious experience witnessed. There is what we experience, the worlds outside and within that we may experience (seemingly there before we acknowledge or notice it) and our self or identity having an experience, that we are conscious and aware of. Our reality is created and placed or “projected” by the whole body through his/her nervous system. It is a part of the whole body who is in and of reality, and our reality including our self is a part of reality in being a part of him/her. We tend to be isolated in our reality, identified with our self and what we experience, from the whole body and so reality.

– For us in “our reality”, reality is the whole body who “projects” or creates and places our reality from his/her brain-spine (Central Nervous System). Within our projected reality (where we as identity are) anything that is in and of reality can only appear as projection, as projected by the whole body. Everything that we may experience of reality is a projected indication or version.

It is the real world of whole entities and living beings that is more than what we can experience of them. We may consider an objective world but any notion or sense falls short of reality as what is experienced. Our self and our experience may exist as an actuality as projection, and as such they are a part of a whole being who projects. Our reality is of reality in being a part, as projection or projected actuality, of the whole body – who is in and of reality in his/her entirety (wholeness) that includes our projected reality as a part.

Whole body
– The whole body is in and of reality or creation. We are a part of the whole body “projected” or created and placed by him/her. The whole body includes in his/her wholeness or entirety, his/her solid body and our projected part. We are closer to the reality of a real world and other whole beings in considering the whole body. This is not to deny our self nor what we experience of the world and others. The tendency is rather to deny our whole. We isolate our selves from the whole body in identifying exclusively with our self and what we experience.

Centred right

right is might and in the light
we’re where we’re, centred right
it’s just where we’re projected, right
you’re all right
we’re all right
unless body mirrored, left side right

across from the heart and stomach
over liver’s fissure
ascending colon
hold us tight

I’m right centred too, mate (might be)

but so what
who cares, what’s it matter
if we’re right, centred or not

cebtred right 26Oct14 a from aboveactually,
it’s not about
right or wrong
good and bad or true and false
what we judge and
determine what’s what

no, there’s more actually
to our reality
where, as actuality,
we exist – as is, as we do
beyond what’s what,
our feelings and deepest being

there’s the whole body in reality
of whom our reality is
a projected part

from above

from above

and as actuality,
we are related
with our whole
where we’re projected centred right