Definitions : Witness

How can we be self aware, if not for a witness by which we are aware?

realityhc

The witness is a void, disassociation itself, by which we are aware of our self, and what we experience. It is the displaced complement to the manifestant parts of our reality, namely the self and its experience, but also the conscious and deeper aspects of our being.

We may be aware of what the witness witnesses.

View original post

The conscious and the witness

witness bodies layered as captured from behind

witness bodies layered as captured from behind

Components of our reality, in space : as projected or placed by our whole, through the CNS (Central Nervous System).

Our reality consists of 1) our self or identity (having an experience or experiencing), 2) our deeper being, 3) what we experience of the world including other whole beings of reality, and our worlds or realms within, 4) all that is necessary for us having an experience, before the CNS and the projection of these components, including the conscious and the witness, 5) the spaces between these components.

We may know or recognise that we are conscious and that we are conscious of our self (self conscious) and what we experience. Intentionality describes the nature of the conscious being conscious of something, ie., of our self and of what we may experience in our reality.

To witness is a familiar act and experience of observance. However, the witness as a noun or entity is difficult to determine, as the actuality or existence of the self is. We can determine what we experience, but the self as the experience-er is subject to the difficulty of self-referencing; we cannot determine the determining self (“self-referencing conundrum”).

The witness is a step removed again.We cannot witness the witnessing self. We can infer a witness in being aware of our experiencing self (self aware); it allows for an awareness of what is experienced and of our self. It is a vacuous disassociation behind that , despite its state, occupies space and that position.

The conscious reigns from above our reality. The mind's spread with notion above and sense below, our line-up and facing the world we see, and the mind's identity towards the mid-line.

The conscious reigns from above our reality. The mind’s spread with notion above and sense below, our line-up and facing the world we see, and the mind’s identity towards the mid-line. Centred right and as captured from behind.

These components of our reality may be recognised in their actuality or existence in space as projected parts. The distinction of the witness and conscious is made by this positional distinction from a spatial orientation, of what are there, i.e, in terms of where they are. Otherwise the self-referencing conundrum refuses such differentiation between self-aware and self-conscious.

I label as the conscious what reigns from above our self and our experience, and as the witness the disassociation behind by which we are aware, of what is witnessed.

What is orientated in space of our reality is orientated with our whole self to be “in relation with” our whole self.